<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" ID="2457">
<titleInfo>
<title>Journal of International Trade Law and Policy:</title>
<subTitle>A necessary reform of agriculture
market access rules</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Ismaelline Eba Nguema</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<typeOfResource manuscript="yes" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
<originInfo>
<place><placeTerm type="text">ENGLAND</placeTerm></place>
<publisher>EMERALD INSIGHT</publisher>
<dateIssued>2020</dateIssued>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<edition></edition>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="text">ENGLISH</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="gmd">Text</form>
<extent>BAIK</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<note>Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate by text and empirical facts, the need to reform the
rules in force.
Design/methodology/approach – This study confronts current standards with empirical facts. To
do this, it is postulated that even though current market access standards are better that the Gatt 1947
rules, they leave the possibility for some members to hijack them to eventually increase their protection
effective tariff.
Findings – Market access standards for agricultural products should be reformed because of their
asymmetry. To put an end to this asymmetry, these standards should be rebalanced. This is precisely the
challenge of the current multilateral negotiations.
Originality/value – Unlike the studies conducted on this subject (to my knowledge), which are mainly
based on economic or political science methods, this analysis is essentially based on legal reasoning law.</note>
<subject authority=""><topic>Richest members</topic></subject>
<subject authority=""><topic>Market access, AoA, Poorest members</topic></subject>
<classification>NONE</classification><identifier type="isbn"></identifier><location>
<physicalLocation>Repository Universitas Langlangbuana Sistem Repository Elektronik Skripsi, Tesis, Desertasi dan Penelitian Dosen Universitas Langlangbuana</physicalLocation>
<shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
<holdingSimple>
<copyInformation>
<numerationAndChronology type="1">JA101.JITLP20V19.2.3</numerationAndChronology>
<sublocation>My Library</sublocation>
<shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
</copyInformation>
</holdingSimple>
</location>
<slims:digitals>
<slims:digital_item id="14420" url="" path="/3. A necessary reform of agriculture market access rules.pdf" mimetype="application/pdf">A necessary reform of agriculture market access rules</slims:digital_item>
</slims:digitals><slims:image>COVER_Journal_of_International_Trade_Law_and_Policy.png.png</slims:image>
<recordInfo>
<recordIdentifier>2457</recordIdentifier>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-12-20 08:59:05</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-12-20 08:59:33</recordChangeDate>
<recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo></mods></modsCollection>