<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" ID="2448">
<titleInfo>
<title>TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT:</title>
<subTitle>CRISIS MANAGEMENT OF AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES IN THE DIGITAL ERA: THE CASE OF EPIDEMIC PREVENTION AND CONTROL IN CHINA</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Yan Pei</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<typeOfResource manuscript="yes" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
<originInfo>
<place><placeTerm type="text">ENGLAND</placeTerm></place>
<publisher>EMERALD INSIGHT</publisher>
<dateIssued>2023</dateIssued>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<edition></edition>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="text">ENGLISH</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="gmd">Text</form>
<extent>BAIK</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<note>Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to ﬁgure out how authoritarian regimes conduct crisis management
through application of technology, institutions and people.
Design/methodology/approach – By means of a literature review, this paper brieﬂy reviews the digital
governance of authoritarianism and its approach in crisis management. Then, a case study with empirical
analysis is conducted to explain how an authoritarian regime would perceive and manage crises in the digital era.
Findings – China’s response towards COVID-19 was mainly based on digitalised grid management.
Government’s perception of the crisis directly inﬂuences directions of institutions, while technology is
developed, applied and iterated with the needs of institutions, rather than the public interests. And for the
general public, the level of trust in the government directly affects the acceptance of technology.
Originality/value – Previous studies on crisis management of authoritarian governments in the digital era
have mostly been conducted from a techno-ethical perspective. However, this paper veriﬁes that the use of
technology in crisis management requires involvement of institutions and public.</note>
<subject authority=""><topic>China, Crisis management, Digital governance, Auth</topic></subject>
<classification>NONE</classification><identifier type="isbn"></identifier><location>
<physicalLocation>Repository Universitas Langlangbuana Sistem Repository Elektronik Skripsi, Tesis, Desertasi dan Penelitian Dosen Universitas Langlangbuana</physicalLocation>
<shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
<holdingSimple>
<copyInformation>
<numerationAndChronology type="1">JC301-TG-23 V17.3.12</numerationAndChronology>
<sublocation>My Library</sublocation>
<shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
</copyInformation>
</holdingSimple>
</location>
<slims:digitals>
<slims:digital_item id="14411" url="" path="/JC301-TG-23 V17.3.12.pdf" mimetype="application/pdf">CRISIS MANAGEMENT OF AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES IN THE DIGITAL ERA: THE CASE OF EPIDEMIC PREVENTION AND CONTROL IN CHINA</slims:digital_item>
</slims:digitals><slims:image>TRANSFORMING_GOVERNMENT.png.png</slims:image>
<recordInfo>
<recordIdentifier>2448</recordIdentifier>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-12-19 23:06:55</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-12-19 23:07:43</recordChangeDate>
<recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo></mods></modsCollection>