<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" ID="2443">
<titleInfo>
<title>TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT:</title>
<subTitle>METADATA QUALITY MATTERS IN OPEN GOVERNMENT DATA (OGD) EVALUATION! AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF OGD PORTALS OF THE GCC CONSTITUENTS</subTitle>
</titleInfo>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Abiola Paterne Chokki, Charalampos Alexopoulos, Stuti Saxena, Benoît Frénay, Benoît Vanderose, Mohsa</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<typeOfResource manuscript="yes" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
<originInfo>
<place><placeTerm type="text">ENGLAND</placeTerm></place>
<publisher>EMERALD INSIGHT</publisher>
<dateIssued>2023</dateIssued>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<edition></edition>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="text">ENGLISH</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="gmd">Text</form>
<extent>BAIK</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<note>Purpose – The study seeks to investigate the quality of metadata associated with the open government data (OGD) portals of the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) constituents – Bahrain (BH), Kuwait (KW), Oman (OM), Qatar (QA), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Design/methodology/approach – A quantitative framework, supported by extant literature, is adopted
to assess the metadata quality of the six OGD portals of the GCC constituents.
Findings – Among the six GCC countries, QA has the most advanced OGD metadata quality followed by
KSA, UAE, OM, BH and KW. Furthermore, the OGD metadata quality (MQ) of UAE and OM stand at the
same pedestal whereas BH and KW OGD portals are lagging behind.
Originality/value – While the OGD quality has been investigated in extant literature, the MQ of the OGD
portals for the GCC countries has not been investigated so far – the present study seeks to plug this gap.</note>
<subject authority=""><topic>Open government data (OGD), Open data, Metadata, E</topic></subject>
<classification>NONE</classification><identifier type="isbn"></identifier><location>
<physicalLocation>Repository Universitas Langlangbuana Sistem Repository Elektronik Skripsi, Tesis, Desertasi dan Penelitian Dosen Universitas Langlangbuana</physicalLocation>
<shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
<holdingSimple>
<copyInformation>
<numerationAndChronology type="1">JC301-TG-23 V17.3.7</numerationAndChronology>
<sublocation>My Library</sublocation>
<shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
</copyInformation>
</holdingSimple>
</location>
<slims:digitals>
<slims:digital_item id="14406" url="" path="/JC301-TG-23 V17.3.7.pdf" mimetype="application/pdf">METADATA QUALITY MATTERS IN OPEN GOVERNMENT DATA (OGD) EVALUATION! AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF OGD PORTALS OF THE GCC CONSTITUENTS</slims:digital_item>
</slims:digitals><slims:image>TRANSFORMING_GOVERNMENT.png.png</slims:image>
<recordInfo>
<recordIdentifier>2443</recordIdentifier>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-12-19 22:24:12</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-12-19 22:25:16</recordChangeDate>
<recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo></mods></modsCollection>